Foveon sensors have many advantages, so why are they not more popular?

Written by Phil Rhodes

SigmaThe Sigma DP2 uses the Foveon X3 sensor

New technology often has difficulty establishing a foothold even when it is better than the current incumbent tech. We continue our series looking at alternative technology that should by rights be more popular than it is.

Read the first part of this series here.

One imaging technology which seems to dance almost permanently on the edge of oblivion is . The eponymous organisation became part of Sigma in 2008 and manufactures the X3 sensor, with each pixel comprising a stack of three photodiodes. The idea is that red light will penetrate the silicon most deeply and be detected in the bottommost. The green will go not quite so deep and be detected by the middle one, and the top one will see the blue. There are, consequently, no artefacts from colour interpolation as in an image from a Bayer-filtered sensor.

Sigma has sold the Foveon X3 technology ever since the SD9 camera in 2002. The 2268 by 1512 sensor sounds small until we realise the technology allows each point to be not just a photosite but a full pixel with red, green and blue elements. Comparisons to a conventional Bayer camera are tricky, but the design certainly allows for a milder antialiasing filter. Some designs have used none and yet suffered no colour moire, though they may suffer conventional moire as with any camera. Spacing between the individual colour photodiodes is the same for all colours, as opposed to a Bayer design where the green elements are much closer together than the red and blue.

Sadly, no, it's not really possible to see the individual photosites on a modern sensor, even in a macro photograph. A basic microscope will reveal them, though

There are downsides. The idea that different wavelengths penetrate to different depths is not as absolute as this simple explanation makes it sound, and in order to get to the red photodiode, the light has to pass through the blue and green ones as well. That can be solved with a bit of mathematics, but the compromises mean things are less ideal than they might seem. At the same time, the vast market has driven massive advances in the design of Bayer-patterned sensors, even to the point where the resolution is now so high that small errors in the location of colours are easy to overlook.

There's no immediate sign of Foveon technology taking over the moving picture market

In the end, lives and the comparison with Bayer sensors is complicated. Each is good at specific things. Certainly, Foveon sensor technology has not gone the way of the plasma display, but the incumbent technology is putting up stern resistance.

Tags: Technology

Comments

Related Articles

24 May, 2020

Sensors need better technology, not more resolution

 

The Sensor of the Future

Replay: This was first published in 2013, but the discussion about sensor technology is as relevant as ever. Just how can...

Read Story

27 April, 2020

Maxon Cinema 4D S22 first release from the new subscription model

Maxon has updated Cinema 4D, the company's acclaimed VFX, 3D modelling, animation and rendering software, to version S22. This is the first release...

Read Story

27 April, 2020

LaCie Rugged drives are the perfect storage you need when going gets really tough [Sponsored]

There can't be many more extreme environments to be in than the Arctic tundra during a full white out blizzard. This is the sort of environment that...

Read Story