$30K Anamorphic vs $1K Spherical lens. Can you even talk about them in the same sentence?

Written by David Shapton

Ryan FreemanCooke anamorphic vs Zeiss spherical

Filmmaker Ryan Freeman has asked the unaskable: can you compare a $30,000 Cooke anamorphic lens with a $1,000 Zeiss spherical lens? 

Well, to insert a bit of a spoiler here, no, you can't. Cooke makes gorgeous and expensive lenses that have graced the very finest film shoots thoughout history. And the point of this video - as Ryan respectfully points out at the end - is not to make it seem like nobody needs to buy Cooke lenses any more.

But do you need to give up your filmmaking ambitions if you can't afford to pop £30,000 on an anamorphic lens? Absolutely not. You can get great - and cinematic - results for a very small fraction of this. What you don't get is the oval bokeh and the overall feel of a truly great anamorphic lens. 

But what you do get with the remarkably inexpensive Zeiss lens in the video is a perfectly decent-looking shot that is bang in the middle of what filmmakers with a low budget can achieve - while they're saving up!

Thanks Ryan! Ryan's website is Lossless Creative.

His Youtube channel is here

 

Tags: Production

Comments

Related Articles

25 September, 2020

Be careful how you pixel peep

Pixel peeping is a popular way to compare cameras, but is not a reliable method of comparison.                                                      ...

Read Story

25 September, 2020

The Blackmagic URSA Mini Pro 12K just got even better

This week Blackmagic Design released a new firmware for its Ursa Mini Pro 12K camera that gives it new frame rates.                                  ...

Read Story

24 September, 2020

Canon C70: A new 'baby' cinema camera with 4K up to 120fps

Canon has expanded its Cinema EOS line of video cameras with the introduction of the EOS C70 4K Digital Cinema Camera.                              ...

Read Story