Interlacing is dead

Written by Barry Braverman

Barry BravermanInterlacing is dead

 

When I started in this business in the 1970s we shot film and we shot it happily and merrily and we did it progressively – frame by intermittent frame. Today a few decades later we professionals have been shooting progressive video frames for so long it's hard to imagine ever having shot interlaced pictures

So is interlacing dead from an image capture perspective?

For most of us the answer is probably yes. Fact is, even many broadcasters today routinely capture progressive images for a wide range of programming. Top American news magazine shows like 60 Minutes now shoot 1080p30, the network having long since moved on to high definition and the concomitant increased visibility of defects, understands the desirability of avoiding the ugly aliasing, loss of resolution, and the many post-production snafus associated with shooting 60i.

Bias against progressive

In Japan there continues to be an overall bias against progressive image capture. The major camera manufacturers like Sony and Panasonic still look primarily to interlaced origination at 50i or 60i when designing their new cameras. This may seem odd to most of us but there is a logical economic reason given the demands of traditional broadcast clients like NHK who thus far have resisted the progressive trend elsewhere.

 

Fig_1_Aliased_telephone_pole.jpg


Progressive capture eliminates the risk of aliasing artifacts when panning across scenes with strong vertical elements.

 

Fig_2_Picket_Fence.jpg
While progressive frames may appear sharper even with fewer lines, the additional motion blur needed to offset the risk of strobing can reduce apparent resolution. Panning too quickly across this white picket fence will almost certainly produce a noticeable stutter at 24p or 25p.

 

210_shutter_small.jpg

To reduce the strobing risk the shooter may increase the camera frame rate to 30 FPS or 60 FPS. If this is not feasible within the scope of a production the shooter may employ a slightly slower shutter by 20% in order to increase the amount of motion blur inside the frame.  Alternatively the shutter angle may be increased from 180º to 210º. This was a favorite strategy when shooting with film cameras; it works just as well now, provided your particular camera allows shutter setting in degrees.

 

Tags: Technology

Comments

Related Articles

31 July, 2020

This is how Netflix is adapting Anime to modern technology

The streaming service brings 4K and HDR to the classic Japanese artform in the latest example of its prototyping production techniques.

Netflix's...

Read Story

30 July, 2020

Gigabyte Aero 17 XA review: A competition beating powerhouse [sponsored]

The Gigabyte Aero 17 XA has some pretty nifty specs on paper. How does it stack up in the real world, and more importantly against the competition?

...

Read Story

30 July, 2020

For all film makers: How to avoid losing your stuff and where to put it

Replay: The technological revolution has created great opportunities for new film-makers everywhere, but has in its wake created a new challenge:...

Read Story