This is a fascinating look at how the incredible cinematography of 1917 was created

Written by Simon Wyndham

The film 1917 is winning plaudits across the board, but it's the cinematography that has gained attention from within the visual industry. Just how do you film a movie on this sort of scale in one shot? Here's how they did it.

The quick answer is, of course, that it wasn't filmed in one shot, but the final result is a film that appears to be. A lot of the time 'one shots' tend to be a bit overinddulgent. Rarely are such shots done in such a way that they serve a true storytelling purpose. But when they are done right, such shots can be stunning to watch, as well as driving the story forward.

1917 isn't the only feature film to have been made to appear as one continuous take. Famously 2002's The Russian Ark was truly filmed in one take using a Steadicam, and it was heralded as a technical triumph. 1917 is an entirely different animal. Set during the Great War, it required huge, complicated sets, pyrotechnics, scenes in white water (the river Tees near Barnard Castle and Tees Barrage if anyone is interested), all of which makes shooting such a production truly in one shot impossible.

But that didn't deter Roger Deakins. Pushing things to the limit, 1917 required meticulous rehearsal so that everything could be timed, in some cases, almost to the second, with rarely a window for error. In the video below Hurlbut Academy takes a close look at how the cinematography in the film was created.

Tags: Production

Comments

Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story