Suddenly, 6K is the new, dominant, acquisition format. How did that happen?

Written by David Shapton

PanasonicThe Panasonic LUMIX S1H is one of a number of new 6K capable video cameras into the marketplace

Several 6K cameras have been announced and there might be more to come. What is it about 6K that seems right for today's filmmakers?

All of a sudden, it looks like is a new sweet spot for cameras. Our recent survey shows that while plenty of camera users are expecting 8K to become the norm, many are still delivering in HD, with 4K solidly established as an acquisition format. 

So why is 6K appearing in so many guises? It's actually easy to see why. 


If it's true, which I think it is, that consumer and professional video tends to move inexorably towards higher resolutions, then 6K seems a sensible place to stop for a rest on the journey towards 8K. Shooting at sixteen times the resolution of HD seems a step too far for most filmmakers at the moment (although RED has shown it to be entirely feasible), but 6K is noticeably better than 4K without the enormous data overhead of 8K. That makes almost everything easier - and cheaper.

So 6K fulfils the imperative to move towards higher resolutions while keeping the costs of buying and using a camera at this resolution reasonable. 

Is it really progress? It depends how you define it. In terms of saving the planet, probably not. But more quality is generally seen as a good thing by artists.

BMPCC 6K domination.jpg

The is one of the latest cameras to use what is now becoming a common resolution


Sensors are intrinsically monochrome, so some potential resolution is sacrificed, via a Bayer-pattern filter of colour dyes in order to allow an algorithm to derive a colour picture. The process is remarkable but inevitably involves losses. It means that a genuinely 4K sensor will not output 4K colour pixels, if we're being picky. 

For a sensor to give a genuine 4K colour output, it needs to start with a more pixels, to allow for the resolution loss. 

And seems like a good number. Again, our survey shows that (after HD!) 4K is likely to be a popular delivery resolution for some time to come. So shooting in 6K is ideal for downsampling to very good 4K. 

And that's it, really. There are other advantages: mild reframing, better digital stabilisation, recomposing (all assuming delivery in 4K or below), but the ability to move deBayering artefacts out of the way by making them less significant is a good enough reason to buy 6K in my view. 

The next few weeks in the lead-up to IBC in Amsterdam (second only to NAB for global importance) will show whether I'm right or not.

Tags: Production


Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story