JVC's GY-HM70: Low light performance at a low price

Written by RedShark News Staff


JVC has released details of their new GY-HM70 camera aimed at camera operators working at weddings, events and a wide range of other contexts. Stand-out features include strong low-light performance and "superior" image stabilisation

The new camera has a 16 x F1.2 lens which when coupled with JVC's Super LoLux technology is capable of working in less-than-ideal lighting conditions. Manual focus, iris and shutter controls are available as well as manual and automatic white balance.

Designed to look like a professional ENG-style camera, the GY-HM70 has a 12 Megapixel 1/2.3 inch CMOS sensor that can also capture still images. It can shoot at 1920x1080/50p (60p in the US and former NTSC regions).

High frame rates are possible, topping out at 300 fps at 720x480 resolution.

JVC battery first

JVC claims a first with the GY-HM70's hot swappable dual battery system, that allows batteries to be swapped during recordings.

Recording is to SDHC/SDXC cards carried in dual slots, and recordings are switched between slots to ensure continuity.

On-board processing is courtesy of JVC's "FALCONBRID" technology which "handles large amounts of video data at exceptional speeds.

Pricing and availability

The GY-HM70 will be available in May 2013 at an MSRP of US$1,995

Tags: Production


Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story