AJA is now shipping its Ki Pro Ultra Plus

Written by RedShark News Staff

AJAFor anyone who remembers the first generation of HD decks this might as well be magic

We were impressed when AJA first announced the Ki Pro Ultra Plus back at NAB and the good news is that it’s now shipping.

The Ki Pro Ultra Plus is a multi-channel recorder offering 1,2,3 or 4-channel simultaneous HD recording up to 1080 50/60p. Switch it into single channel mode, meanwhile, and you get 4K/UltraHD/2K/HD recording and playback, with full HDMI 2.0 input and output (up to 12-bit capture and output). Apple ProRes and Avid DNxHD MXF are both supported.

It also offers decent I/O flexibility and has a range of connectivity options from 3G-SDI to HDMI 2.0 and fibre. Users can record four channels of HD simultaneously as ProRes files, each with different compression profiles, to AJA Pak 1000, 512 or 256 SSD media, with eSATA options also available.

It also has its own LCD screen which can display the channels in a quad split during capture for confidence monitoring, or that signal can be output over HDMI, SDI, fibre, and the device’s web-based UI.

It’s a neat little package housed in a portable 2RU half-rack and, as we said back in May, is the closest thing we've seen to a genuine replacement for a studio deck. What’s more, at a price point of $3995 it’s around a tenth of the price — not to mention probably a tenth of the weight — of an HDCAM deck.

 

Tags: Production

Comments

Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story