Paperman - where paper and CGI meet

Written by Patrick Jong Taylor

DisneyPaperman

Previously only screened in theaters with the feature Wreck-It-Ralph, Disney released its Oscar-contending short, Paperman, online

UPDATE: After posting this article, the Paperman video has since been removed from Disney's Youtube channel. We apologize for the inconvenience. We've replaced it with a link to a "Making Of" film that explains the techniques behind Paperman.

Back in December, we profiled Paperman, a buzz-worthy short from the good folks at Disney. The Mouse included the short in the theatrical release of its hit, Wreck-It-Ralph; great news for movie-goers, bad news for us. Due to copyright restrictions, we couldn’t show you the full short, instead opting for behind the scenes videos on the animation process. Our readers really responded to the article, covering an experimental combination of 2D art powered by 3D models and animation.

Best animated short

Since then, Paperman has been selected as a nominee for Best Animated Short for the 2013 Academy Awards. Disney, in its infinite marketing wisdom, has finally given the winning romantic short its widest possible audience, by releasing it online. Now let’s see how long it takes Paperman’s biggest rival, The Longest Daycare (starring The Simpsons’ baby Maggie), to follow suit...

 

Tags: Production

Comments

Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story