RedShark Review: DJI Phantom 3 Advanced Drone

Written by Guest Author

George Krieger / RedShark NewsDJI Phantom 3 Advanced

George Krieger reviews the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, the middle of the Phantom line, and assesses how it stacks up with its little and big cousins, the Standard and Professional models.

DJI makes two entry level drones. The one we reviewed previously was the most inexpensive entry level drone, the Phantom 3 Standard ($699 USD). This time around, we're taking a look at the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced, a definite upgrade from that lower priced model. At $999 USD, this drone compares much more closely to the Phantom 3 Professional model ($1259 USD) than it does to its cheaper cousin, the Standard.

Comparing Phantoms

The biggest advantages are the usable distance and the camera's sensor. This P3 Advanced camera is the same Sony Exmor series of sensors as the P3 Professional, albeit with lower capabilities for the video parameters. However, the still images and other still modes are all the same quality as the P3 Professional. In almost every respect, this sensor beats the P3 Standard sensor, hands down. It has better low light, white balance, color and clarity than its cheaper cousin.

DJI_0029-2.jpgA two second exposure taken with the DJI Phantom 3 Advanced wearing a PolarPro ND8 (3 stop) filter

The P3 Advanced model has the same powertrain and controller as the P3 Professional, beating the P3 Standard with increased usable distance (up to 1.2 miles from 2000 feet) and better power, but at the same speed (35MPH or 16KPH with no wind in ATTI mode). The P3 Advanced has all the same shooting modes as the Standard, plus it is capable of 2.7K video at 60fps on a better Sony Exmor sensor. It has the same camera design and can use the same filters as the P3 Professional. I have been using PolarPro filters to extend the capabilities of the Advanced model.

DSC_6032.jpgPolarPro Phantom 3 Series filters 3 pack for Phantom 3 Advanced and Professional

Using the different still image modes (Single shot, HDR, Burst, Timelapse & AEB), combined with filters and the stabilized aerial platform from DJI, means you can make some amazing imagery. Here is a 30 image 360 degree spherical panorama that I made with this combination of equipment.

Bixby_Advanced_PL1_spherical_panoGroup_0-DJI_0053_DJI_0084-30_images_0001-Edit.jpg30 image panoramic image of the Bixby Creek Bridge, in Big Sur California.

The verdict

Buy the DJI Phantom 3 Series Advanced model if you don't need 4K video and a few faster fps rates of the Professional model. You are getting the same aircraft, gimbal and a slightly less capable Sony Exmor Sensor. The still capabilities are exactly the same with 12 megapixel images. For the true Cinematographer, the Advanced may not stack up. But for any entry-to-intermediate level aerialist of any discipline, this is a very capable and cost effective drone.

In terms of flight, I thought that I would find many more differences between the Standard and Advanced models, but they are both quite similar to fly and use. After the next firmware upgrade, all Phantom models should work with 3rd party apps in the same manner, which is great news, no matter which Phantom you choose.


DJI Phantom 3 Advanced Photo Gallery

All stills below were taken with a DJI P3 Advanced & PolarPro PL1 Polarizing filter by George Krieger

DJI_0007_08_09_10_11.jpg

DJI_0104_tonemapped.jpg

DJI_0121_.jpg

DJI_0154.jpg

DJI_0170_1_2_3_4.jpg

DJI_0128.jpg

Tags: Production

Comments

Related Articles

2 August, 2020

This is how the first DV cameras changed video production forever

The 1980s were the decade when video began to encroach on film – certainly for TV, if not for cinema. The 1990s was the decade when digital cameras...

Read Story

1 August, 2020

This is one of the biggest influencers on modern video you might not have heard of

If you’ve started using cameras in the last few years you might not be aware of just how far cameras have come. For some time one of the go-to...

Read Story

31 July, 2020

Why do we keep thinking in 35mm for focal lengths?

Replay: Do we really need to keep using 35mm as our baseline for focal lengths, or is there a much better way?

Read Story